Symposium Regime Change in Eritrea

The political situation in Eritrea has been a source of concern for many years, with a government that has been accused of human rights violations and repression of civil liberties. The country has been ruled by the People’s Front for Democracy and Justice (PFDJ) since it gained independence in 1993, with no significant opposition or independent media.

There have been various calls for regime change in Eritrea, but the reality is that effecting change in such a closed and repressive environment is a difficult task. One approach that has been suggested is the use of a symposium, which is a form of dialogue and collective problem-solving that has been used successfully in other contexts.

A symposium approach would involve bringing together stakeholders from different sectors of Eritrean society to discuss the challenges facing the country and to find solutions that are acceptable to all parties. This would include representatives from the government, civil society organizations, opposition groups, the military, and other key actors.

An upcoming symposium on Eritrea is scheduled to take place on July 14th, 15th, and 16th from 10am to 7pm at the American Catholic University’s Caldwell Auditorium located at 620 Michigan Ave NE Washington, DC 20064. This symposium aims to bring together Eritrean experts, scholars, activists, and policymakers to discuss the current political situation in Eritrea and to explore possible solutions to the challenges facing the country.

The symposium approach has several advantages. It allows for a collaborative and inclusive approach to problem-solving, which can help to build consensus and create a sense of ownership over the solutions that are developed. It also provides a forum for dialogue and engagement between different groups, which can help to build trust and understanding.

However, there are also some challenges to the symposium approach. The government in Eritrea is unlikely to be willing to participate in such a process, given its history of repression and control. There is also a risk that the symposium could be co-opted by the government or other actors, leading to outcomes that do not reflect the views or interests of all stakeholders.

In conclusion, the idea of a symposium approach to regime change in Eritrea is an interesting one that deserves consideration. It offers a way to engage in dialogue and problem-solving that could help to address the challenges facing the country. However, it is important to recognize the challenges and risks involved in such an approach, and to ensure that it is carried out in a way that is transparent, inclusive, and accountable to all stakeholders.